I finally finished reading Fannie Flagg's Fried Green Tomatoes at the Whistle Stop Cafe. I think it took me so long to finish this book (years, in fact) because it's nothing like the movie, Fried Green Tomatoes, which I grew up watching. But now that I've finished it I can definitely say: the book is so much better!
First of all, I love the film. Love it. I love Jessica Tandy and Kathy Bates, I love Mary-Louise Parker and Mary Stuart Masterson. The film is great. However, the film avoids the core of Idgie and Ruth's relationship: namely, that it is a loving, sexual relationship between women. The film shows two women who have an intense friendship, an indivisible bond, and maybe even some sexual desire (that is not acted on). Ruth comes to live with her friend out of desperation: she is constantly abused by her husband and has to escape before she has a baby in such a horrible environment. There are moments of intimacy, sure, but the relationship is never defined, by Ruth and Idgie or by other members of the community, as anything but platonic.
The film's interpretation of this relationship makes me so sad because it's the reason the book is so interesting. In the book, Idgie and Ruth have an open lesbian relationship. Ruth leaves to get married because she feels Idgie is too young to choose a partner, not because she doesn't love or need her. When Idgie gets lonely, she visits the local prostitute (I couldn't think of a nicer word for her, but prostitute doesn't really fit), Eva. When Ruth is living with Idgie and about to have her baby, Idgie's father gives her what I have to call a 'man-to-man' talk; he talks to her about the responsibilities of caring for and supporting a family. The book is so interesting because it shows an open lesbian relationship in the South in the 1930s (and on) that is never questioned, never scorned and never ridiculed. No one in the book wonders why two women are living together, raising a child. No one questions Idgie's right to discipline Stump, as another parent would. No one questions the love and devotion that exists between Ruth and Idgie. Everyone simply understands that Ruth and Idgie are a loving a couple like any other.
What I think the film really gets right is Kathy Bates's character, Evelyn Couch. She may be one of my favorite literary characters ever. In the beginning of the novel, she is exactly the woman that Betty Friedan was writing about: She's married because she thought she had to be. She never had sex before marriage for fear of the bad girl reputation, but finds as an adult that she has less knowledge of sex than her sixteen-year-old daughter; worse, she discovers that nothing horrible ever happened to the bad girls in high school, they are all unhappy or happy, married or not, just like everyone else. She feels like she missed out on feminism, and doesn't understand it. She lacks control in her life and tries to gain it through hopeless dieting. Through the meetings with Miss Threadgoode and the stories of Idgie and Ruth, Evelyn gains the confidence and understanding she needed to take back control of her life. The film shows this beautifully, with Kathy Bates slowly getting stronger, going through an angry, man-hating phase, and finally settling down in a place where she's happy, employed, and healthier.
The biggest travesty of the film is the ending, when we discover that Miss Threadgoode has been Idgie all along. Never mind that she has explicitly told us that she married into the Threadgoode family by marrying Idgie's brother Cleo (incest anyone?). Never mind that she's discussed having a child of her own. As a professor of mine put it, the filmmakers seemed to have wanted to 'redeem' Idgie, by having her straighten up (literally), marry a man and have a family of her own. Never mind that it doesn't fit the character of Idgie, whom we've watched onscreen for an hour and a half at this point! Never mind that it doesn't make any sense!! I hate to think of this move being remade, because of the beautiful performances by all of the actors involved; but, I would like to see a film that explored the relationship between Ruth and Idgie as it was written to be.
I don't want this to be a rant against the film, because I do love it. I've watched that movie since before I can remember. My grandmother looks and sounds just like Jessica Tandy, and I love all the memories of watching the movie with my sisters and seeing our grandmother so perfectly imitated onscreen. But for those who love the film, or even who have never seen it, Fried Green Tomatoes at the Whistle Stop Cafe by Fannie Flagg is a must-read novel.
You know, I have watched that film so many times and never gotten the impression that Ms. Threadgoode was Idgie. But I read the book first, so maybe I just didn't see that because I wasn't expecting it. I guess I'll have to watch it again. I always thought Ms. Threadgoode was an odd but realistic narrative. Why not hear the story directly from Idgie or Scout? What happened to them and the Whistle Stop café?
ReplyDeleteI remember watching the movie for the first time, freshmen year at Sewanee, and telling my roommate that in the book Idgie and Ruth were really lesbians. She didn't believe me. :) I've got to say that the reasons I love that book are also my problems with the book. I love that Idgie's family accepts her so openly, so unconditionally, and the same with the town, but I also find it frustrating because that would never, ever have happened, especially in the time period. It's sort of like a historical fantasy novel which either dreams of or idealizes a better South, depending on how you want to look at it.
I definitely understand what you mean, but actually, throughout history you can find examples of homosexual couples being accepted by loved ones. Granted, sometimes they were accepted in a "we just don't talk about it" way, but it definitely happened.
ReplyDeleteWhile i am in support of any kind of loving relationship, I think it's wrong to just assume that because two women are best friends and they are living together they are automatically lesbian - I have got good girl friends I am very close to and love but that doesn't make me a lesbian
ReplyDeleteYes, but what I was saying is that the women ARE in a sexual, same-sex relationship in the book, no question about it. It's explicit in the text.
ReplyDeleteNever having read the book heck i didn't even know there was a book. But anyways at first seeing this film I always assumed they were in love with each other. That`s probably why i loved it so much. Am actually watching it right now :-) .
ReplyDeleteMrs. Threadgoode is not Idgie. Some people get that impression because Kathy Bates looks at Jessica Tandy and says: "Idgie?" She's referring to the card that was left with the honey on the tombstone. Jessica Tandy says "Yes" and starts talking about Idgie in the third person, as she has done throughout the movie. I can see why some people might think she's Idgie and that she just likes to tell a good story and be mysterious but it just doesn't hold water. The fact that she married Idgie's brother makes it clear to me that she is NOT Idgie.
ReplyDeleteYou're right of course. Obviously Ninny is not Idgie. She's her sister-in-law.
DeleteThe book makes it clear that Ninny and Idgie are different people, as Ninny has died and Evelyn is visiting her grave when she finds the jar of honey and the note on Ruth's tombstone. ... In the film adaptation of this book, Idgie and Ninny are indeed the same person.
ReplyDeleteFried Green Tomatoes (1991) -
I think personally the movie was way better than the book, even though the movie left out a lot of details that were in the book
ReplyDelete